Wednesday, August 21, 2019

Jewish "Disloyalty," according to President Trump

It is an unbelievable moment, requiring response despite its stupidity.  So here it goes.

Today President Trump clearly elaborated that he believes that any Jew who votes for the Democratic party is "Disloyal to Israel and to the Jewish People." Those were his words, after a lengthy explanation.

He is either 1) AntiSemitic, 2) Ignorant/Stupid, 3) Machiavellian, or 4) a Jackass.  Here is why.

The AntiSemitism of Disloyalty:

Jewish "loyalty" and "disloyalty" is a known antisemitic attack.  The idea, going back to the Middle Ages and finding its logical extreme in Nazi Germany, is that a Jew can not be loyal to a secular country in which he or she lives.  The accusation is that a Jew's loyalty is to an external power, the Jewish People, and in our day the State of Israel  over and against their professed (but dishonest) loyalty to their home nation.  This is core White Nationalist and Nazi philosophy, headlined in all their writings and pursued without regard to fact.  From the Dreyfuss trial in France to Louis Brandeis' confirmation hearings to the US Supreme Court, accusations of dual loyalty are the rallying cry of the AntiSemite.  ONLY loyalty to the supreme leader can be accepted and all other identity is intolerable.  The Jew is, in this vision, is not only disloyal, but insipid and treasonous.  I do not believe that the President is AntiSemitic, but his callous use of personal loyalty in the context of "The Jews" is a horrific gaff of some kind.  So what kind?

Ignorance or Stupidity:

One apology for the President's comments is that he didn't know that such a trope, "disloyal," screams of AntiSemitism.  This was the claim of Rep. Tlaib when she said that AIPAC was "all about the Benjamins baby ($100 bills)."  Just as I didn't give her a pass for using an AntiSemitic trope, neither do I give the President a pass.  If he didn't know, he had better address it.  On the other hand, he might be incapable of understanding the subtle nature of trope, making him intellectually deficient.  I won't conclude that he is stupid.  I do believe that he may be ignorant of the trope.  He must recognize what that is in some way if we are to believe it to be an accident of any kind.

The Machiavellian/Bannon Interpretation.

If you hold that the president is brilliant, then this was a calculated move for a purpose.  Possible purposes could include: 1) Distraction from the fiasco of back-peddling on universal background checks after the El Paso Shootings, or 2) distraction from the ridiculous diplomatic gaff of wanting to buy Greenland from Denmark even though Greenland has independent home rule (I believe this to be the distraction move, not the disloyalty comment), or 3) creating a wedge issue out of Israel loyalty to divide the democratic party.  This final interpretation is what the President said on the White House lawn, explaining at length that this is about the anti-Israel members of the progressive wing of the Democratic party: that they are the new face of the Democrats and that voting for the Democrats is therefore supporting AntiSemites.  This implication is the basis for his saying that Jews are being "disloyal" to Israel and the Jewish people.  In other words, he is using the AntiSemitic trope to rile up the Jewish electorate against AntiSemitism, and challenging them to prove that they are against AntiSemitism by only voting for the Republican party and himself.  This is sharp, deliberate, intelligent and - quite frankly - morally repugnant.  To deny the loyalty of the 67% of American Jews who voted for Clinton for either the State of Israel or the Jewish People is identity politics at its worst.

Option Four:  He is just a Jackass.

In fact, I do believe this is the only real takeaway.  I believe that President Trump is largely ignorant of political history, and entirely ignorant of social history.  I believe that he instinctively understands that calling Jews disloyal is a manipulation of identity politics that was sure to trip up news narratives on other topics, while continuing to paint the progressives as anti-American and anti-Israel.

His comments however, are extremely in line with the worst Nazi and White Nationalist hate groups' views of Jews.  Was it good politics?  Was it expedient?  Will it help him in the election?  Almost certainly yes.  But it is, once again, incredibly empowering of the hatred on the extreme right which we are facing in this country at this time.  He knows enough to know it this is a bigger topic than he pretends. He did it not just yesterday but again today, and at length.  What do you call a person who uses insulting and divisive language with no regard for the harm it may do directly or indirectly to other people?  Quite simply, a jackass.

Conclusion:

President Trump has once again given a gift to the extreme right, demonized the far left, and this time thrown the loyalty of the Jew into the public square for mob trial.  Well done, Mr. President, if that is your intent.  Walk it back immediately if it was not.

Friday, July 26, 2019

Omar's BDS failure.... so far

We see you, Rep. Omar, and are not that stupid. We affirm the US alliance with Israel and reject your BDS maneuvers.


On July 16, 2019, Rep. Omar of Michigan (D) proposed a  bill in congress to support BDS against Israel.  That bill was expressed as a civil rights bill, to protect the right to boycott as a civil right.  The bill says:
Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
(1) affirms that all Americans have the right to participate in boycotts in pursuit of civil and human rights at home and abroad, as protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution;
(2) opposes unconstitutional legislative efforts to limit the use of boycotts to further civil rights at home and abroad; and

(3) urges Congress, States, and civil rights leaders from all communities to endeavor to preserve the freedom of advocacy for all by opposing antiboycott resolutions and legislation.

So, that's no so bad, right?  The bill will never see the floor of the House.
Why?  Because her bill is not a civil rights bill, it is a BDS bill against Israel even though it doesn't say it.  The BDS movement seeks to specifically target Israeli economic, political, social and academic institutions and individuals in Israel and throughout the world.  It punishes one side of the conflict while simultaneously denying that side's right to peaceful participation in the global community.  It is a bill based in prejudice against Israeli's and blind sweeping support of Palesitinians as a whole, regardless of their own particular political or social views and actions.  It would protect a terrorist, and fire a painter or poet.  The U.S. House of Representatives is not that stupid, and saw right through her efforts, despite her sardonic inclusion of the holocaust in her preamble to her bill.
In fact, one week later on July 23rd, a bill opposing the BDS movement against Israel passed the H. Res 246.  This bill passed by a vote of 398-17, with 5 "present":
Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
(1) opposes the Global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement (BDS Movement) targeting Israel, including efforts to target United States companies that are engaged in commercial activities that are legal under United States law, and all efforts to delegitimize the State of Israel;
(2) urges Israelis and Palestinians to return to direct negotiations as the only way to achieve an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict;
(3) affirms the Constitutional right of United States citizens to free speech, including the right to protest or criticize the policies of the United States or foreign governments;
(4) supports the full implementation of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–296; 128 Stat. 4075) and new efforts to enhance government-wide, coordinated United States-Israel scientific and technological cooperation in civilian areas, such as with respect to energy, water, agriculture, alternative fuel technology, civilian space technology, and security, in order to counter the effects of actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel; and
(5) reaffirms its strong support for a negotiated solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict resulting in two states—a democratic Jewish State of Israel, and a viable, democratic Palestinian state—living side-by-side in peace, security, and mutual recognition.

In other words,  boycott divest and sanction is against any reasonable effort to achieve a peaceful and just resolution to the conflict for all sides.  For now, the U.S. Congress is absolutely clear on that topic.  But note the 18 votes against the resolution, and wonder... is this the beginning of a slow creep for BDS?  Is this the beginning or the end?

Representatives who voted against HR 246.  Keep an eye on them, as they are often in the news:
Blumenauer
Carson (IN)
Dingell
GarcĂ­a (IL)
Grijalva
Jayapal
Lee (CA)
Massie
McCollum
Moore
Ocasio-Cortez
Omar
Pingree
Pocan
Rush
Tlaib
Watson Coleman

The 5 Representatives who voted "present" (an abstention):


Amash
Bass
Davis, Danny K.
Huffman
Johnson (GA)



Wednesday, July 24, 2019

My only post on impeachment

The question of the President's impeachment is on my mind.  I write here not to advocate, but to process.

The only "Jewish" issue involved is the morality and ethics of one who is charged with a legitimate duty fulfilling that duty in their private lives.

Can someone who breaks shabbat teach shabbat (yes)?
Can someone who eats treife supervise kashrut (no)?
Can a president who breaks the law enforce the law (not objectively, no)?

The question of k'tocho ba'aro - one's inside should be as one's outside speaks to trust and hypocrisy.  Nevertheless, I write here to put it down - and perhaps to leave it behind - in my own thoughts.

---------------


The Power of Impeachment.

United States Constitutional sources:

Article 1, section 2:  The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Article 1, section 3:  The Senate shall have sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Article 2, section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

------------------

History of actual impeachments voted by the House:

1868 - Andrew Johnson, for violating an act of Congress in how he fired a member of his cabinet.
1998 - Bill Clinton, for lying under oath and obstructing justice in an investigation, both about his personal sexual life.

Both were tried in the Senate, and not convicted by the 2/3 majority required.  No president has ever been removed from office by this power of Congress.  Under threat of impending impeachment, President Richard Nixon chose to resign and be pardoned by his immediate successor, President Gerald Ford.

That's it.  No other president of the United States has ever been impeached by the House and (therefore) tried in the Senate.

-------------------

My feeling about the Presidency and impeachment:

What are "High Crimes and Misdemeanors?"  I believe that either a high crime, or a misdemeanor can be sufficient for legitimate impeachment.  When Clinton lied under oath, and attempted to obstruct justice, he was a legitimate target for impeachment.  Why?

A sitting President is the chief executive for the enforcement of the law.  He/She must be beyond reproach in observance of the law.  But, if he/she commits a misdemeanor (let's say, shoplifting or possession of a small amount of marijuana), should he/she be removed from office?

A sitting president may not be tried by any authority other than impeachment.  The DOJ has a firm policy that the sitting president may not be charged with crimes or misdemeanors in any setting other than the House.

Therefore, while I supported President Clinton politically, I believed that his impeachment was both petty and legitimate.  Before asking if it was necessary, I will comment on Trump.

-------------------

My feeling about President Trump and Impeachment. 

I believe that, objectively speaking, it is absolutely clear that President Trump attempted to obstruct justice regarding the Mueller investigations.  I also believe that he did so in a manner that is both similar to, and more serious than the second article of impeachment against Bill Clinton.  As such, he is also legitimately subject to impeachment by the House of Representatives.

Now, words really matter here, because the constitution says the President "shall be" removed upon impeachment and conviction.  Does that mean that the House shall impeach?  I.e. the House must impeach?  Not, it doesn't.  Article 1, Section 2 affirms the House's "sole power," which means it is entirely within their prerogative to do it or not, regardless of the preponderance of the evidence.  That means, to re-use Trump's example from his January 23, 2016 campaign speech, he could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue as a sitting president and shoot somebody and the House would not be forced to impeach him.

My own conclusion is that any president who is accused to have obstructed justice should be impeached and tried in the Senate.  Like any other accusation of wrongdoing, there is a process by which the accused is exonerated.  In this case, that can - and should - only happen in the Senate.  I also believe that this will not occur.

-------------------

What I don't like.  I don't like that Nancy Pelosi is making this a hedge bet for the political future.  I recognize that the current situation in the United States is polarized and "everyone" believes that "everyone else" is acting only out of political/tribal loyalty.  Pelosi is politically astute and knows that the Republicans will not convict Trump of any article of impeachment in the Senate.  Therefore the only reason to impeach him in the House would be for political gain, and it is not clear that the Democrats would gain politically from that.  Therefore, for political reasons, she is not supporting impeachment.  I really don't like that point of view.

Is she right? Yes.  Is she politically right?  She probably knows a lot better than me. But I believe that she is wrong as a matter of ethics.  I believe that there is an ethical mandate to bring the matter forward to trial. It is serious and it is real.  It should be recorded in history as such.  Sometimes the right thing to do has nothing to do with probable outcomes.

So that's it.  I believe obstruction of Justice is a legitimate cause for Articles of Impeachment.  I believe that Trump has clearly met the criteria for obstruction of justice. I believe he should be impeached, and then tried.  And if he is not convicted, the rule of law will have been observed. Sometimes guilty people are not convicted.  Of course, as I said, it won't happen.

-------------------

Having gotten it off my chest, moving forward I support those who call for impeachment, because it is the right ethical stance.  But our leaders in government will not act on it, and time is precious.  I will work on other things.

Monday, July 15, 2019

Back to your own country?!

 In a series of tweets yesterday, President Trump suggested that four members of Congress should return to the “totally broken and crime infested places from which they came.” Each has a strong ethnic, religious and/or cultural background. 

3 of the 4 were born in the United States of America and the fourth immigrated legally at the age of 12.

Yes, Mr. Trump, Detroit (Rep. Tlaib), Chicago (Rep. Pressley) and the Bronx (Rep. Ocasio-Cortez) are "totally broken and crime infested places."  But you never lived there, so you think they don't exist in your America.  You never had to work for a subsistence living or feed a family in the face of institutional poverty and prejudice. Unlike other children of privilege who turn their wealth towards those in need from a sense of gratitude and care, you declare them unwelcome in your America. 

Mr. Trump's world view it is that the white and the wealthy represent some idyllic nobility in this country.  His life of privilege and prejudice leads him to this world view, which has in no way diminished while in the White House.  

I am sure that it would be more convenient for him if representatives of inner-city American congressional districts would just go away and crawl back under the rock that their districts live under.

I call on all supporters of the President to purge this kind of language from the Republican Party.  I call on all people to affirm the economic, social, cultural, religious and racial diversity that defines the greatness of this country and the nobility of its entire citizenry.

The President's comments are revolting, revealing and wrong.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

New Elections September 17

The 80th Congress of the United States was called the "Do Nothing Congress," but Israel has it beat as the 21st Knesset votes to dissolve itself without even forming a government.

The new election will be held on September 17th, just two weeks before Netanyahu's first indictment hearings in court on October 2 and 3rd for corruption.  In the meantime, Jared Kushner arrived in Israel yesterday in the middle of the mess instead of in the court of the new Prime Minister's government.  Jared is saved by the turmoil, as the Trump peace plan seems to be nothing more than an economic plan for further investment in Israel, the PA and the territories, mostly with Saudi and Bahrain support.  Russia and China, two of Israel's largest trade and political partners, will not attend the Trump-led conference.

More to come...

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Israel's Elections 2.0 - Time for a Do-Over

Well well well.  When last we met, I gave a sweeping "ho-hum" to another Netanyahu coalition victory and his easy path to a governing coalition in the next Knesset.  Never sleep on Israel, because the impossible has happened:  Netanyahu, even with a 3 week extension from President Rivlin, has failed to form a coalition of 61/120 votes to create a government.

First, I'll summarize the electoral seats by party, and then I'll tell you what has happened.

As you see, the left/center Blue and White party TIED Netanyahu's Likud party with 35 seats each.  However, the "Right" scored 65 seats and the "Left" only 55 seats, so there is no left wing path to a majority.

Three parties, Gesher and Yemin Hadash, failed to enter the new Knesset.  The Arab parties diminished from 13 seats total to 10.  Meretz went down 1. Labor lost 12 of its 18 seats.  Moshe Kahlon's Kulanu party dropped from 10 to 4, barely surviving.  Lieberman's Yisrael Beitenu stayed even at 5, and the far right religious parties gained 3 seats between them.

So, with a comfortable 65 seats, how could Netanyahu fail to form a coalition of 61?  It all hangs on a single party: Yisrael Beiteinu.

Likkud (35) + Religious Parties (21) is 56. Adding Moshe Kahlon and Kulanu (4) only gets him to 60.  It is Yisrael Beiteinu's 5 seats - and only their 5 seats - that wins the day.  And Y.B.'s leader, Lieberman, is the one who left Netanyahu's coalition last December forcing elections in the first place. My how the worm turns. 

(scroll right for the full chart)
DatePolling firmHadash
Ta'al
Ra'am
Balad
MeretzLaborBlue &
White
GesherKulanuYisrael
Beiteinu
LikudZehutNew
Right
United
Right
ShasUTJLR
Outgoing Knesset[8]5851811110530N/A35765466
16 AprElection results[9]64463504535005885565

So what happened?  Basically, Lieberman refused to accept a government without the religious population serving in the army like everyone else.  The religious parties refuse to accept a government unless their exemption from military service remains.  It's a stalemate.  This was the exact issue that dissolved the coalition in December, and it hasn't gone away.

What happens next:

Tomorrow is the deadline for Netanyahu to form a coalition.  There are exactly three possibilities:

1) Lieberman and Neyanyahu get over their problems, Lieberman gets everything he wants, and somehow the religious parties don't bolt.  This "won't happen," but it is still Israel - so we'll know tomorrow.

2) Netanyahu reports to Rivlin that he has failed, and leaves the new election in place.  Rivlin will turn to Benny Ganz, head of Blue and White, and give him a chance to form a coalition.  With only 55 seats, including 10 Arab seats, he would need all the Arabs to cooperate, and 6 more seats.  Again, Kulanu gives him a total of 59, and Yisrael Beiteinu is the king maker.  Would kulanu, yisrael beitenu and the Arab parties cooperate in a government?  Highly unlikely.

3) The current Knesset can vote to dissolve itself, and set early elections.  This is, in effect, a do-over.  The bill to dissolve the knesset has "passed its first three readings."  This seems to be the plan.  Here we go again.  


So what?  Well, in fact this third option creates all kinds of crazy.  The Yemin Hadash folks will be back in the mix. Do they recant, apologize, and join Likkud - or some other party?  

The political death/life of B.B. Netanyahu:  But more importantly, Netanyahu will be under indictment for serious corruption crimes already being raised against him.  He was counting on the new knesset passing laws granting him immunity, and granting the knesset power over the judiciary.  Those laws will now not get passed, leaving him subject to direct prosecution.  How will THAT effect the election?  Will the electorate move away from him?  Will his party depose him?  Rumors have it that he has promised Moshe Kahlon a list of spots on the likud list in the next election.  If he promises Kahlon 5-10 seats, that means 5-10 current likud winners will be pushed down beyond the threshold, and will be losing their jobs.  That is not a good maneuver for a man who needs the support of every member of his party if he is to survive.

So, we'll know more tomorrow.  I can only say, "Stay Tuned."

Monday, April 29, 2019

How does Never Again become Yet Again?

In memory of Lori Gilbert Kaye, z"l, who will be buried today according to our customs, after being senselessly murdered by an AntiSemitic white supremacist on Saturday in the Chabad of Poway, CA.

With prayers of refua'ah shleimah - full healing of body for Rabbi Yisroel Goldstein, Almog Peretz, and 9 year old Noya Dahan, wounded in the attack. And with prayers of refu'at hanefesh, healing of the spirit to all who are terrorized by this act of violent hatred against Jews everywhere.

Tree of Life Rabbi Jeffrey Myers said Saturday, “My words of ‘never again’ have disappeared from my language.  They’ve been replaced with ‘yet again.’ And so it is that we stand here yet again at this corner as one united community.” The rabbi and his community also suffered a violent murderous attack against his synagogue in the fall, and now we have become.... what?

The number and scope of the public reaction is less.  That is a simple fact.  There are fewer vigils, fewer gatherings, fewer letters and comments of support, fewer shocked faces, and fewer tears. All of these are happening, but are more muted.  What are we becoming?  How fast to we "get used to" hate and violence?

Reading 8chan, the unmonitored websites that this shooter used to post his vitriol, it is clear that there are many more like him.  Comments include disappointment that he killed so few, anger that he didn't train better, mockery that he fled and worse. 

There must be no "normalization" of this hatred and violence.  The horror shock and anger of Pittsburgh must be held even higher today after Poway.  

More to follow.

Sunday, April 28, 2019

Another AntiSemite Kills Jews in Chabad of Poway, CA

My heart and prayer goes to the members of Chabad of Poway in the wake of this horrific Passover news story.  Sh'fokh Chamat'kha al ha-goyim asher lo yad'ukha... As the passover Haggadah at Elijah's cup cries, "Pour out Your wrath" on those who hate and kill and have destroyed and devoured God's peoples in all places. We pray that God help us to remove hatred from the world we create with Him every day.

On Saturday, April 27, 2019 a little after 11:30 in the morning, a 19 year old white supremicist walked into Chabad of Poway, CA and opened fire.  He killed one, wounded 4 (including the rabbi and a young girl) and fled the scene when his AR-15 failed and congregants tried to oppose him.  He was captured on the highway shortly thereafter.

Like the murder in the mosques in Chirstchurch New Zealand, he posted his rambling hatred on the internet shortly before the killing began.  To read this example of white supremicist hatred, click here. He was clearly aware that he was attacking on the 6 month anniversary of the slaughter at Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh PA by another white supremicist.  He reportedly referenced both, while saying that Trump is wrong to support Israel.  An initial report can be seen here.

Unfortunately, we are starting to have a large enough sample size of these killings to establish patterns and outliers.  Up to this point "lone wolf" attacks by radicalized individuals were isolated incidents.  The only indicators would be participation in hate sites on the web where free speech limitations prevent close individual monitoring and surveillance.  This time, however, the shooter claims to have fire bombed a mosque in the area, a crime previously unsolved.

This hate is not new, but the internet's ability to help an individual to feel a part of a larger world without actually meeting anyone in that world in person is the new wave. Now Dillon Russ, Robert Bowers, and Brenton Tarrant can all reach beyond their individual hatred of Jews, Muslims, African Americans and immigrants and be part of inspiring future violent hatred around the globe.

Friday and Saturday as we ended Pesach we had a Sheriff's car in the parking lot and armed manpower in the building.  We have received DHS grants for locks, doors, glass, cameras and more.  We have taken the necessary precautions.  But we are not at ease, because we know that a shooter like John Earnest would have seen the car and simply moved on to a softer target to kill.

The answer is not just in pylons, cameras, and door locks. The only answer is armed, trained, opposing force in every synagogue.  And it is an imperfect answer, to be sure. But the time of debating this has long gone. Synagogues need trained guns.


Tuesday, April 9, 2019

Today is Israel Election Day - Last Polls and Predictions

Today Israelis are already at the polls.  While initial turnout is reported as slightly low, this is unlikely to remain the case.  First, Israel has one of the very highest voter participation rates of any voluntary voting system in the world.  Second, the election is close and widely felt to be determinative of dramatically different outcomes based on very slight changes in results.

By Israeli law, no polls in the last 4 days may be published leading up to an election.  So here are the FINAL poll results available to the voting public as they choose the next Knesset.

There are two key indicators:

1) Kachol Lavan is consistently polling to take 1-2 more seats than Likkud.  However, as previously explained in my posts, it is Israeli President Reuven Rivin's prerogative to give either Likud (Netanyahu) or Kachol Lavan (Ganz/Lapid) the first crack at forming a governing coalition of 61 votes in the newly elected 21st Knesset.

2) Ra'am-Balad (Beduin/Arab nationalist), Gesher (Orly Levy), Kulanu (Kahlon) and Yisrael Beiteinu (Lieberman/Russian) are all hanging near the 3.25% threshold for inclusion in the Knesset. A minimum of 4 seats is given to parties making the cut this year, but their votes are distributed proportionally among the victor parties if they don't.  Ra'am-Balad would vote to the left, and Yisrael Beiteinu to the right.  Gesher seems to be entirely out of it at this point, but would likely not support Netanyahu.  Kulanu would vote to the right.  Shas, and the other parties, have all established themselves in the polls.  Netanyahu's last minute announcement that he would annex Jewish settlements and towns in the West Bank/Judea-Samaria could take some votes from the far right parties, and could actually hurt him if it drops


Despite that possibility, every poll on April 3-5 showed a right wing coalition forming under Netanyahu as Prime Minister.

The ONLY possibility of a left wing government, by these polls, would be if Yisrael Beitenu AND Kulanu fall below the threshold, while Ra'am-Balad rise above it.  Then the "left" might have a chance at organizing a coalition first - if Rivlin permits it.  This is a highly unlikely scenario.

SUMMARY PREDICTION:  Netanyahu will enter the 21st Knesset with a solid coalition of right wing parties, and will proceed to annex Jewish settlements in the West Bank/Judea-Samaria.  The next great challenge to this will be twofold.  First, the Palestinians will receive broad and unified international support against the move, and the forces of "West Bank Boycott" will grow - particularly in Europe, but also in America. Note that the Democratic Party is solidly "two-state solution" still, so this will enter the American Presidential election.  Second, It will become increasingly difficult to simultaneously deny that there is an "occupation" on the one hand, and not allow Palestinians in the West Bank/Judea-Samaria to vote on the other hand.

This may or may not be "inevitable" or "right," depending on your own political view.  The entrenchment of a one state solution, however, will clearly create a long term challenge to Israel's democratic character.  Claims of Apartheid and "Palestinian bantustans" will grow, and while the actual development of the Israeli and South African maps are completely different historically, socially, economically and politically, the visual image of pockets of Palestinian settlement within surrounding Israeli settlement will not go away.

That's it for now.  Let's count the votes and watch the developments in the days/weeks/years ahead.

Bottom Line:  Netanyahu emerges stronger than last time.  Now he just has to worry about his Attorney General's pending indictments.  

Polls

Poll results are listed in the table below in reverse chronological order, showing the most recent first. The highest figure in each survey is displayed in bold, and the background shaded in the leading party's colour. In the instance that there is a tie, then both figures are shaded. Parties that fall below the threshold are denoted by the percentage of votes that they received (N%) instead of the seats they would have gotten. When a poll has no information on a certain party, that party is instead marked by a dash (–).
These tables list the polls published from the time that Yisrael Beiteinu left the government coalition in mid-November 2018,[7] until election day.
Legend
Note: Political blocs do not necessarily determine the exact makeup of post-election coalitions.
DatePolling firmHadash
Ta'al
Ra'am
Balad
MeretzLaborBlue &
White
GesherKulanuYisrael
Beiteinu
LikudZehutNew
Right
United
Right
ShasUTJLR
Current seats[8]5851811110530N/A35765466
5 AprElection silence starting end of Friday before election day.[9]
5 AprPanel Project HaMidgam/Statnet/Channel 13[10]6451128(2.8%)4428667565466
5 AprSmith/Maariv[11]745929(2.6%)5427566675466
5 AprMaagar Mohot/Radio 103FM[12]77931628667675466
4 AprSmith/Jerusalem Post[13]64592845527456665664
4 AprMidgam/Yedioth Ahronoth[14]7451130(2.2%)5426565575763
4 AprMaagar Mohot/Israel Hayom & i24 News[15]6(2%)81032(2%)6(2%)27666585664
4 AprTNS/Kan[16]846830(2.9%)5(2.4%)31666465664
4 AprMidgam/iPanel/Channel 12[17]7451030(2.6%)5526565575664
4 AprMiskar[18]7451028(2%)(3.18%)(1.2%)31878665466
3 AprPanels Politics/Walla![19]8461030(2.1%)(2.9%)429567565862
2-3 AprDialog/Haaretz[20]7451027(2.8%)5430557565367