Tuesday, May 15, 2018

The New U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem (See the map)

Yesterday marked to formal move of the embassy of the United States of America in Israel to Jerusalem.  It was a day full of pomp and celebration by supporters of Israel and Israelis together. While the Palestinian Nakba protests continued, a peaceful and joyous commemoration of the new building was taking place in Jerusalem itself.

Yes, Jerusalem is the capital of the State of Israel, and has been for over a half a century.  This is where Israel's government sits, and does the business of running the country. 

The controversy is based on historic opposition to the existence of the State of Israel at all.  The 1948 armistice line, called the Green Line from old military maps, marked the division between Jordan and Israel until 1967. In the Six Day war that year, Israel conquered everything from Tel Aviv to the Jordan River in that region.  The Oslo Accords returned local governance of non security issues in certain Palestinian areas, including areas to the East of Jerusalem, where Palestinian majorities are pervasive. The final resolution of Jerusalem and its status as capital of Israel and or a Palestinian State was left for last level negotiations.  Since then, Israel needed to build a separation barrier on the eastern side of the city for security purposes, and the peace process has broken down.  Yet the continual governance of the united city of Jerusalem has continued unabated, and well.

Moving the embassy was delayed for many administrations to avoid "picking sides" in the final status of the City.  But that is ridiculous.  Should the U.S. put an embassy in an area whose "final status" is in Israel, then it is the embassy in Israel.  Should that embassy wind up in a State of Palestine, then it will be the embassy in Palestine.  Should it be determined (never) that Jerusalem becomes the United Nations original pipe dream of an International City, then - mazal tov - you have a consulate for the United Nations there.  Putting a U.S. embassy building down in Jerusalem changes nothing, except it refuses to cater to the delusion that Israel is not real and permanent.  Good negotiations begin with facts, truth and clarity.  Opening the embassy does that.

Now, what IS interesting is the piece of land chosen by the U.S. While it has not been covered by the media, the embassy straddles the Green Line.  The west side is on the Israeli side of the green line and the east side is on the old Jordanian side of the green line.  Theoretically the building can accept people from either side, without controversy.  Cynics however will say that it declares Israeli sovereignty by ignoring that it is building "across the green line," in part on "occupied territory."




Personally, I like the choice, as it makes the situation clear and declares that the United States is in the middle of it for ever.  

In the meantime, television coverage continues to focus on the Hamas inspired "suicide by cop" protests on the Gaza border.  There, hundreds of people at a time are attacking the border fences, trying to enter Israel for violent purposes.  What nation in the world would not protect a border from such invasion, and with live fire if necessary?  If thousands of people along the Mexican or Canadian border started launching fire bombs into American fields, planting bombs along the border fences, and tried en masse to breach the fences in an organized attack, wouldn't the ICE border control agents have to use their weapons?  Wouldn't they use tear gas first, which issuing clear warnings?  Wouldn't they use fans to blow away smoke for clear view? Wouldn't they fire warning shots?  Wouldn't they have to defend the territorial integrity of the U.S. with live fire if none of that worked?  They rules aren't different just because it's Israel. 

The Palestinian cause needs to return to the negotiating table.  This bloodshed is their plan, and their purpose.  Israel must hold fast, even as it loses the publicity war to protect its people.



Friday, May 11, 2018

RA Statement on Iranian Attack on Israel

RA Statement on Iranian Attack on Israel

In response to Iranian rocket attacks against Israel late Wednesday night, the Rabbinical Assembly released the following statement:
Wednesday, Iranian forces fired some 20 rockets at the Golan Heights, marking the first time the regime has directly attacked Israel from Syria. Thankfully, the Iron Dome missile defense system was able to intercept a number of the rockets, and no Israelis were hurt in the attack. In response, Israel attacked multiple Iranian and Syrian military sites early Thursday morning.
We echo the calls of world leaders in condemning Iranian aggression and attacks on Israel. Israel has every right, and an obligation to its citizens, to defend itself against such Iranian provocations.
While we commend the Israeli military for its bravery in protecting the people of Israel, we pray for an immediate de-escalation of violence and the safety of all people.

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

AJC statement on US Withdrawal from the Iran Nuclean Agreement

cid:image001.jpg@01D2F9CA.8675E8F0

AJC Statement on President Trump’s Decision to Withdraw from Iran Nuclear Deal

May 8, 2018 – New York – AJC CEO David Harris, responding to President Trump’s announcement today that the United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal, issued the following statement:

When the JCPOA was first announced on July 14, 2015, AJC took three weeks to study the agreement, meet with a range of high-level American, European, and Middle Eastern officials, and engage in a thorough internal discussion. This was undertaken against a backdrop of nearly two decades of AJC’s focus on the growing Iran threat, and countless discussions from Beijing to Berlin, from Tokyo to Paris, from New Delhi to Brussels, from Washington to the UN, and well beyond.

In the end, we concluded that we could not support the deal, as we feared its flaws – no binding provisions on ballistic missile development, no focus on Iran’s destabilizing regional behavior, weaknesses in the coverage of the inspections regime, and a dangerous sunset clause – would ultimately define it.

Moreover, the fact that the deal was never submitted to the U.S. Senate and that not one Republican senator voiced support, coupled with weak public approval according to various national surveys, almost ensured that once Republicans came to power the JCPOA would be in danger.

Regrettably, that’s exactly what happened.

In addition, despite repeated Obama Administration predictions, which we ourselves heard more than once, that the JCPOA would moderate Iranian behavior and lead to greater focus on domestic growth and development, Tehran has expanded its regional aggression, repeatedly flexed its military muscle, continued its calls for Israel’s annihilation and “Death to America,” and flaunted its expanding missile program.

And Israel’s remarkable intelligence coup in Iran further underscored the longstanding Iranian pattern of deceit, deception, and disinformation, and served as an additional warning to the international community about the true intentions of Iran’s leadership.

President Donald J. Trump never hid his disdain for the JCPOA or his threat to withdraw the United States from it. But he also left open the possibility that, if our European allies, would be willing to address seriously the core weaknesses, then there was an alternative to “nixing” the deal. Regrettably, however, despite efforts on both sides of the Atlantic, full agreement on a path forward has to date eluded the Americans and Europeans.

That is profoundly regrettable. Despite our many reservations, we had nonetheless hoped to see the deal “fixed,” not “nixed,” at this stage of the game.

We can only hope that today’s action by the President, significant as it is, will not end the effort to find common ground. The last thing anyone should want is a wedge driven between the U.S. and our European partners, as Iran would inevitably become an unintended beneficiary. And given Iran’s current and future threats to regional and global security, that should be an outcome no one in the U.S. or Europe wants.

Tuesday, April 17, 2018

A Letter from Israel on her 70th Anniversary

I share with you the thoughts and feelings of our sister synagogue, Shira Hadasha in Arad, Israel.


Dear Friends and Family,

In approximately three hours, we’ll be walking to the entrance of the city to take part in the Arad Memorial Day ceremony. It is  one of the most impressive ceremonies that I have ever attended. It totally reflects what life in Israel is all about. 23,645 Israelis have lost their lives in defense of the country. 50 of them are from Arad. Each of them will be remembered individually. Fallen soldiers are considered children of all of us. 

At 20:00 (8 P.M.), sirens will go off all over the country and everyone will bow their heads and stand at attention. All traffic will come to a standstill. The same thing will happen tomorrow morning. All school programs will be dedicated to this. 

All regular TV and radio programming will cease and all shows will be dedicated to stories about these soldiers lives. This next 24 hours are very difficult for all of us. 

The tradition in Israel is that we follow a day of intense sorrow with one of intense joy. Israeli Independence Day begins exactly 24 hours later. It is heartwarming to see how so many people have decorated their houses and cars.  Marvelous celebrations take place all over the country and many people have bar-b-ques.  Many Army bases are open to the public as well as all National Parks. 

These two days, as well as last week’s Holocaust Day, always make me remember why I made Aliyah and have lived here the past 44 years.  

Lihitraot-Rafi

Friday, December 15, 2017

Ignoring the Truth About Hate Crimes, and Scapegoating Muslims

Here is a very interesting and important statement from MPAC, the primary lobbying organization in Washington on behalf of the American Muslim community:

I have found the work of MPAC in recent years to be credible, important, and well grounded in common American constitutional values.

It raises a very troubling issue, covered in some of the press, that the current administration has formally and as a matter of government policy equated violent extremism with Islam, to the exclusion of other forms of violent extremism.

In America most violent acts of hate are racial, according to the FBI's annual Uniform Crime Report, Hate Crimes publication. That said, within then religious hate crime category, the most common form is anti-Semitic in nature, perpetrated by non-Muslims against Jews.

See Hate Crime. (2010, July 15). Retrieved December 11, 2017, from https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/

If we want to make America safe from hate crimes, we must not exaggerate a single and convenient scape goat for political advantage. We must look at the actual facts and patterns of real violence, and organize government policy accordingly.

Tuesday, December 5, 2017

Jerusalem is the Capital of Israel - but keep the embassy in Tel Aviv

According to multiple news outlets, President Trump will announce tomorrow that the United States officially and formally recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of the State of Israel and that he will begin the process of moving the embassy there. President Trump has been clear that he is not committed to a two state solution, and that makes the move enormously symbolic in the eyes of Palestinians and their supporters.  Not surprisingly, the Muslim world and Palestinian Authority President Abbas have uniformly condemned the idea, and threatened Israel and the United States with the specter of violence and conflict in response.    A peaceful political move is immediately opposed with threats of violence. I believe that this is one of those moments where you see everyone's true colors.

The truth is, as a matter of established and objective fact, Jerusalem is the capital of the Modern State of Israel. 

The parliament meets there.  The prime minister lives there.  The government's offices are there. The law of the land has established itself there. The people of the democratic nation of Israel overwhelmingly support it. By every measure of objective and subjective fact, Jerusalem is a modern thriving city functioning in every way as the capital of the State of Israel. 

President Trump is not creating a new reality, he is describing an existing reality.  As a statement of truth, no matter whether you love or hate Israel, Jerusalem simply is the capital of the country. 

Now, there are those in the Palestinian side of the conflict who reject this idea. There is no basis in law, history, or pragmatism to deny Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.  Even the divided city of 1948 had a Jewish Quarter. Even since 1949, the Kenneset has met in the New City outside the old city's walls. Even before Israel conquered the entire city after Arab attack in 1967, and unified it under Israeli rule, Jewish self government already took place there.  If you recognize Israel, you recognize Jerusalem.


And there's the rub.  The only ones who have a logical argument to deny Jerusalem as the actual capital of Israel, are those who deny Israel itself.

Can the argument run the other way?  Sure.  Palestinians (under Jordan) had control of much of Jerusalem from 1948-1967, and surely they have legitimate claim to Jerusalem as their capital as well.  Let - under a genuine treaty of peace - their neighborhoods, and their towns, the seat of their university and government be recognized and also be a Jerusalem and their capital.  Two Jerusalems for two countries.  Only those who deny the Palestinians a right to a state would deny a Jerusalem as their capital as well.  It is exactly parallel.

But that is not what they are shouting for.  They are shouting against the Israeli Jerusalem, not for a Palestinian one.  Listen closely, and realize that it is the fact of Israel's existence that is the essence of their grievance.  Given that stance, forgive Israel if they moved ahead with peaceful living, legitimate sovereignty and independence while hoping for peace one day.

Do not fall prey to the argument of "provocation" that would blame anti-Israeli and anti-U.S. violence on us for making this move.  The abuser always seeks to blame the victim.  Let's be clear: anyone who responds to peaceful politics - like building an embassy - with violence is a terrorist.  Watch them show their true colors.  That is not to say that there is no validity to Palestinian grievance or aspiration.  Surely there is. But intifada is always the answer, instead of peace.

Now, as for moving the United States embassy to Jerusalem, that should not happen.  No, the argument against moving the embassy is that it would be a tremendous waste of taxpayer dollars. The embassy in Tel Aviv is a huge structure, employing hundreds of people. It also houses a tremendous secure infrastructure for not just diplomatic, but military, intelligence and economic interests and agencies.  There is no need to replace or duplicate that structure at the expense of hundreds of millions of dollars just to make a symbolic point in support of Israel.  We don't need it, and we shouldn't build it, because it is not in our own best interests.

Yes, Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.  No, that is not anything new. And no, that does not preclude a future with Palestinian dignity and independence, or even with their own capital of Jerusalem. But Mr. President, do not waste my money by dragging the embassy and all its contents and activities to Talpiot.  We have better things to spend our money on.

Thursday, September 28, 2017

Nazis, Racists, Antisemites... all on the Rise in America

White Supremacy on the Rise
Rabbi Robert L. Tobin
B’nai Shalom, West Orange NJ
Fall 2017, Rosh Hashanah 1


Shanah Tovah.   This morning I want to talk not just about Charlottesville, but what was behind it and what we need to do about it.  White supremacists are on the rise, and they are rallying under the Nazi agenda of Jew hatred in America.  No matter what your politics, you have no luxury to stand aside.  You must know, and you must act.

As you know, on Friday August 11th and Saturday August 12th a large white supremacist rally took place in Charlottesville, VA.  The rally was called, “Unite the Right.”  They recruited their protest under the legal protections of the Bill of Rights, to express opposition to the removal of Confederate statues from public places.  But that was the rallying cry.  As they walked through the University campus, they chanted “Blood and Soil,” the Nazi slogan of racism natural superiority and supremacy over the fatherland - now recast as America.  And if you know our history, and theirs, you will understand how dangerous they truly are. This is how it starts.  This is how it has always started. And it must be stopped.

The forces behind the rally run much deeper than the removal of statues. Right-wing extremism, including white nationalism and white supremacy, is on the rise, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. And a string of killings in recent months raised the specter of far-right violence well before last weekend.

The real goal was to unite and grow racist white supremacy in this country under an American Nazi umbrella.  That goal, to unite a patchwork of previously unorganized and competing groups of far right racists into a common movement, is a seriously troubling development which we must oppose effectively if the lessons of our past are to protect America’s future.

First, we must understand that America is, and has from its founding been, a society of racial conflict and prejudice.  Yes, we have come a long way, and yes, the civil rights movement has produced complete protection under law for all races.  But we must not be fooled into thinking that only the Nazis are racists.  As Audre Lorde wrote in 1991: “Racism cuts a wide and corrosive swath across each of our lives.”

There are two institutional origins to racism in our country: slavery and immigration.  

First, the legacy of Slavery.  Not surprisingly, in the year prior to Charlottesville, those were the conflict points in American culture which dominated the news, the political primaries, and the presidential election.  From Fergusun MO, Freddie Gray in Baltimore, or the sniper attacks in Dallas, institutional conflict between government in the form of police, and black communities dominated the news.  Equal treatment under law is a hard sell in the Black community when nearly one in three African American males between 20 and 29 years of age is under some form of control by the criminal justice system (Mauer, 1999; Pattillo, Weiman  & Western, 2004).  And given the scope of inner-city educational institutional failure, the cliff drops off precipitously.  Among African American men who are high school dropouts, 58.9% - nearly 6 in 10 - will spend some time in prison during their lifetime.   The comparable figure for White dropouts is 11.2% (Lily, Cullen & Ball, 2015).  The fact is that an African American male is very likely to have negative experiences with failing schools, suspicious merchants, frightened suburbanites, ever-present police, and a criminal justice system that incarcerates a third of the people like him at some point in their lives.  While slaves were freed, blacks have yet to find functional equality in America, and that institutional disadvantage spills over in any conflict point.

The second legacy of institutional bias in America is our history of immigration.  From the 1500’s until the late 1800’s, immigration to America was open and encouraged.  We wanted workers. We wanted farmers. Emma Lazarus got it right:
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!" (the New Colosus)

In the late 1800’s a post civil war fantasy of an earlier America combined anti-immigrant sentiments with Confederate resentments at reconstruction in the south.  

Post-confederate feelings of superiority and resentment at their loss, were suppressed under Yankee reconstruction, and generations of institutional white supremacy in the south continued to simmer and organize.  The Ku Klux Klan was born to use violence and terrorism against African American leaders, and to mythologize the Southern White Man.  

At the same time, waves of immigration began from Ireland, Southeastern Europe, and Eastern Europe to the Atlantic seaboard - New York, Philadelphia, Boston.  In California, enormous numbers of Asians, Chinese, arrived to build cities, work farms, and work the hard labor of the new railroads, cities and infrastructure that was crossing the west and building the nation.  Rather than Protestant homesteaders, we now had millions of Catholic, Asian, and Jewish immigrants crowding cities or working as wandering labor without a home across the western territories.  The city of Chicago, for example, had 4,100 people in it in 1833; by 1890, its population had risen to 1 million in just 57 years. By 1910, just twenty years later, it was over 2 million people.  As cities grew, urban blight resulted in social breakdowns and dysfunction, crime and separatism became associated with immigration as neighborhoods pushed out of the cities and wealthier Americans began to settle in suburban zones.  Institutional geographic urban blight became the reality of the American dream. Permanent poverty, social separations, immigrant cultures and groups were viewed as foreigners - poor and dirty.  And into this exact environment came millions of poor Jews seeking a better life.

Jewish immigration to America began in almost quaint terms with the Sephardim in New York in the 1700’s.  In the 1800’s, skilled German Jews arrived and set up shops and a network of dry goods stores across the growing west. But with the new immigration came the Russian and Eastern European Jews who were more often uneducated and poor, and more likely to stay in the new urban environments.  Eastern European Jews began to immigrate to the United States in large numbers after 1880. Pushed out of Europe by overpopulation, oppressive legislation and poverty, they were pulled toward America by the prospect of financial and social advancement. Between 1880 and the onset of restrictive immigration quotas in 1924, over 2 million Jews from Russia, Austria-Hungary, and Romania came to America. Once again, the character of American Jewry was transformed, as the Eastern Europeans became the majority.  And as American sentiment turned against the new immigrants, American Racists found a new enemy in the Jew.

The Ku Klux Klan had a rebirth in the time between World War I and World War II.  No longer merely racist, it was anti-black, anti-Asian, but also developed a specific religious tone becoming anti-Catholic and anti-Jewish.  And, now far enough away from the civil war, it began to adopt a mythology of America that elevated the white supremacist elements of the founding fathers - many of whom were indeed part of a culture of Protestant White Male slave-owners.  But by recasting the characters of the American Revolution as heroes of the white right, they entered a culture war that stakes claim to what it means to be an American in the United States of America.  As such, it was no longer the south that was in play, but the country.

The upheavals of World War I, massive waves of poor and uneducated immigrants, and the bursting of urban blight created both labor movements and anti-immigrant protectionist movements in America.  For the first time, Congress defines and limits immigration based on country of origin - specifically targeting the Chinese and Eastern Europe in a series of laws, ending both Asian and most Jewish Immigration with the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924.  Quotas, Literacy Tests, and provisions against the poor were designed to preserve and protect as sense of American homogeneity - a common white Anglo culture that was at serious risk of being overrun.  

With the rise of anti-Communist fascism in Europe, and the Nazi party in particular, a group called the American Bund formed right here in New York.  In 1939 they held an infamous rally in Madison Square Garden, adopting the full anti-Semitic language of Adolph Hitler.  “Stop Jewish Domination of Christian America” was the primary theme, though the rally was called to celebrate the birthday of their hero - George Washington - whom they called America’s first fascist.  The American Nazi party would not be formed until the post war years, but Nazi propaganda and sentiment could fill the Garden in 1939.

But the racists couldn’t really get their act together.  Some hated Catholics.  That meant white Irish and Mediterranean Italians.  Some hated the North.  Some hated Blacks especially as their lost slave force and subhuman servant class. And, as Tom Lehr famously coined, “and everyone hates the Jews.”  Institutional racism and the civil rights movement is recent enough, that we don’t need to summarize it here, but with the victory of MLK’s I have a dream speech comes frustration in the face of institutional racial disparity and ongoing conflict between both Black America and the patchwork of immigration - legal and illegal - that continues to define American opportunism.  

For the racist in America, the 1960’s was a series of losses at the same level as the destruction of the Confederacy in the Civil War.  Institutional white supremacy in the form of segregation, voting rights, closed towns and college admissions fell like trees in a forest.  Malcom X and others could point to gross abuses like the Tuskegee syphilis study to prove that America was anti-Black and always would be.  Racial tensions on the extremes grew even as a new National consensus of racial equality was adopted by the country at large.  And Kennedy, the first Catholic president, and Johnson pushed a civil rights agenda that included ultimately the complete elimination of quotas from the immigration laws of the United States.  Never again would a country of origin be a reason why you can’t come to America.  Only an ability to contribute to the common good and to not be a burden on society would be qualifying characteristics.  Anti-immigrant sentiment was dealt another loss.  Anti-Catholic sentiment was defeated as JFK became a national martyr and a symbol of American strength and unity.

But hate was still disorganized.  The were shadow groups, and internal conflicts kept them off balance.  The leader of the American Nazi party was assassinated by one of his own, and each ran its own way.  Fast forward past the Arab boycott, Iranian Revolution, the fall of the Soviet Union, 9/11 and the growth of American interest and conflict in the Muslim nations of the Middle East and Asia.    

2016.  America is preparing to say goodbye to its first Black president.  No matter that he was as white as he is Black.  Unlike anywhere else in the world, in racial America one drop of Black is Black.  Advances in civil rights, tolerance of peaceful illegal workers, and acceptance of Muslim refugees are all rallying points for the far right racists.  America under Black and Jewish domination is clearly being destroyed in their view.  Anti-immigrant sentiment and the mainstream policy debate is largely focused on Muslim refugees and undocumented Latin-Americans - commonly lumped together in lazy fashion as “Mexicans.”  Legitimate anti-terrorism language and Homeland Security issues overlap with questions of American power and safety and security concerns.  American policing practices and inner city race conflicts merge into law and order debates, and support for our troops.  Pride for the overseas soldier, and the city police officer conflate in some circles, but with that combination the conflict in those systems also brings together other concerns which are not normally in harmony.  Anti-Muslim sentiment is empowered by anti-terrorist feelings at large.  Despite the fact that the majority of hate crime in this country, and the majority of terrorism in the country is NOT Muslim nor is it international terrorism, but domestic terrorism, the political winds of anti-immigration and anti-Muslims blow together to create a perfect storm.  

Now, if you are anti-black and anti-urban, you have a positive cause in supporting the police.  We all support the police. That is a legitimate objective.  But some come at it now from a racial basis.  Now, if you are anti-Muslim you have a positive expression for it not only in supporting our troops, but in protecting our cities from terrorism.  We all support our troops. We all fight terrorism.  But some come at it from a racial and prejudicial basis.  Now, if you are anti-immigrant and anti-Mexican, you have a positive expression for it in protecting our workforce from cheap and illegal labor.  We all want legal labor and worker’s rights - a safe workplace, civil rights and a living wage.  But now you can come at it from a racist bias if you want.  So, racists, xenophobes and fascists have suddenly found legitimate and mainstream causes to rally around.  The causes are indeed legitimate topics of debate for the civilized society in America. But some can come at it from and racist basis.  When we talk about empowering the radical right, that is what we are saying.  It is real. And it is as American as Apple Pie.  It is born from two hundred years of history, and we are living in a perfect storm for its growth.

2017. Charlottesville.  It all comes together for the Racist far right.  The symbolic power is preservation of southern culture and history in the image of the Confederate statue on the town green.  Who doesn’t value history and culture? The rallying cry is free speech, to unite the right, to embrace and celebrate the Bill of Rights which gives all political and social opinion the right to gather and express what they believe.  Who doesn’t like the Bill of Rights?  And who is suppressing their rights, and destroying their culture?  You got it.  The liberal Jewish media, the international Jewish banking conspiracy, the inferior black criminal mob, and the mongrel hordes of immigrants who are here to not only steal your jobs but to attack your wives and children.  By rallying to the American flag, protecting Confederate imagery, proclaiming freedom, and clearly defining the enemy (especially everyone here today), the Charlottesville organizers have done what none of their predecessors have been able to do.  They have won the stage of equality for their hate in America.  They have turned bickering groups of unorganized racists into a common cause.  

Among the far-right groups engaged in organizing the march were the clubs of the neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer,[22] The Right Stuff,[23] the National Policy Institute,[24] and four groups that form the Nationalist Front:[21] the neo-Confederate League of the South,[21] the Traditionalist Workers Party,[25] Vanguard America,[25] and the National Socialist Movement.[21] Other groups involved in the rally were the Ku Klux Klan,[7] the Fraternal Order of Alt-Knights,[25] Identity Evropa,[26] the American Guard,[27] the Detroit Right Wings,[28] the Rise Above Movement,[4] True Cascadia,[29] and Anti-Communist Action.[27]

Prominent far-right figures in attendance included National Policy Institute Chairman Richard Spencer,[30] entertainer Baked Alaska,[30] former Libertarian Party candidate Augustus Invictus,[31] former Klan Imperial Wizard David Duke,[32] Identity Evropa leader Nathan Damigo,[33] Traditionalist Youth Network CEO Matthew Heimbach,[30] Right Stuff founder Mike Enoch,[30] League of the South founder Michael Hill,[4] Red Ice host Henrik Palmgren,[34]Right Side Broadcasting Network host Nicholas Fuentes,[35] YouTube personality James Allsup,[35] AltRight.com editor Daniel Friberg,[36] former Business Insider CTO Pax Dickinson,[37] Right Stuff blogger Johnny Monoxide,[38] Daily Stormer writer Robert "Azzmador" Ray,[39] Daily Callercontributor and rally organizer Jason Kessler,[40] and Radical Agenda host Christopher Cantwell.[41][4

Numerous armed, right-wing militia groups were present at the rally, claiming to be there to protect the First Amendment rights of the demonstrators. Groups involved included the Pennsylvania Light Foot Militia,[46] the New York Light Foot Militia,[47] the Virginia Minutemen Militia,[48] the Oath Keepers and the 3 Percenters.[49]

By all accounts, this was a fantastic success for the racist extremes in America.  They even have a new, legitimate mainstream name: the alt-right. So legitimate, that the President of the United States could talk about the alt-right and immediately ask, “what about the alt-left?” (!!).  Equivocation, and gross misunderstanding of the nature of the event and the nature of the threat left us all agape and appalled.  Do NOT use the term alt-right.  It names and defines them as a legitimate part of the American discourse.  They are not.  Name the Nazis as Nazis.  Name the racists as racists.  Name the white supremacists as white supremacists.  They do not get to stand on a podium in front of a picture of George Washington, as the Bund did in 1939, and wave the American flag.  

And they hate you.  Make no mistake.  They hate you.  If given the chance, they will follow every law and path that Hitler did.  Attack civil rights. Attack voting rights.  Attack minorities, foreigners and Jews. Unite the right is genuine, and don’t think it can’t happen in America.


         The Jew in America has no luxury to let Nazis organize and grow unopposed.  The Jew in America has no luxury to allow immigrants and refugees to be demonized.  The Jew in America must not let the old hacks of Jewish controlled media, banks and international conspiracy to be legitimized in any portion of the American debate.  We have to speak, and we have to act. Join the committee, follow its actions, get involved, stay involved.

         I admit that there are traps for us here at B’nai Shalom in opposing the new coalition of racist Americans.  Many people will feel that this is Republican versus Democrat.  It must not be. Go be Republicans and Democrats and make sure that racists are not part of your coalition. But here, in this synagogue, we stand against the Nazi Racist movement in America, and will stand for the rights of equality in law which all of our people must enjoy and protect.  We must respect each other, not fall into partisan politics, and concentrate on the core issue here that unites us.
         We will form a watchdog group, and I need volunteers, to track and publish the actions of the newly empowered racists of America.  To push out the messages of the organizations that research and publicize their actions.  Rallies must be published and attended.  Letter-writing and political advice must be engaged.  And most of all, sane reasoned and determined opposition must be created. When the news media hungers to cover the radicals who punch a Nazi on the street or block a Nazi parade with violence, we must work even harder to present an overwhelming majority and a reasonable and peaceful response.  The Freddie Gray riots were stopped in Baltimore when mainstream peaceful people held arms, sang prayed and sat down between the mob and the police.  We need to be those people who proclaim and experience our unity in America.  This is what did not happen in Germany in the 1930’s.  This is what must happen in America now.

         L’shanah Tovah Tikateivu.