Palestine Matters. Israel Matters. And vice-versa.
We live in a world of extremes, where people fear that any perceived support for "their side" fatally weakens necessary support for "our side."
This conflict-oriented mentality has exacerbated American domestic politics and the ongoing conflict between the ideological ideas of Israel and Palestine. It has cost thousands of lives. I believe that this separation into warring camps is an essential problem in our society, in our country and between Israel and her neighbors. This "anti" orientation is the essential problem. I believe that Peace will only be possible when intolerance has become intolerable.
Intolerance is the unwillingness to accept or respect ideas, behaviors, or beliefs that differ from one’s own. In a social context, it is the unwillingness to accept people, behaviors, or identities that differ from one’s own. When one refuses to live in proximity with people who are different, whether in a neighborhood or a country, that person is intolerant. When one views this as a conflict between us and foreigners, they are xenophobic. The essence of democracy is that peoples who differ can live in peace and proximity.
Pro-Israel intolerance is manifested by a negation of the legitimate connection to the lands in and around the modern State of Israel by the Palestinian residents of those lands before 1948 and since. Examples include statements like, "there is no such thing as the Palestinian people," or "there never was a Palestine," whose implication is to say that the resident Palestinian population in 1948 had no rights to self-determination or historical rights to sovereignty in the region. The intolerant Pro-Israel person argues, that since they had no identity, or rights, then their rights can not have been taken or oppressed. In its most extreme form, this is used to justify all manners of forcible capture of land, relocation of populations, permanent occupation and denial of full human rights to Palestinians those areas under Israeli military control.
Pro-Palestinian intolerance is manifested by a negation of the legitimate connection of the Jewish people to the lands in and around the modern State of Israel, before 1948 (and since). It therefore negates their aspirations to expand their historic settlement in those areas by means of establishment of a modern state and then immigration to that state. Examples include statements like, "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," or "colonialism." The implication is to say that the resident Jewish population over time, and in 1948, had no rights to self-determination or sovereignty in the region, and that the State's later immigration laws are invalid. By labelling them land-thieves and colonizers, the intolerant Pro-Palestinian voices justify (directly or indirectly) even the most extreme violence against Israeli civilians and towns as a necessary defense of their own homes against invaders. In the most extreme form, it results in Hamas and its supporters on October 7, 2023 and since.
Both forms of intolerance lead to war. By positioning the conflict as one of pure national sovereign rights on one side, and simultaneously negating those same rights by the other side, the only "just" solution for each side is inevitably use of force. That is to say, in the face of opposition to one's own view of justice and legitimacy, forceful imposition of one's will against the opposition is the inevitable outcome. Claims to pure and absolute sovereign rights are, by definition, intolerant and ultimately violent.
"Two States" is not a compromise. There is no solution to the Israeli and Palestinian conflict without embracing the ideas of Palestine and Israel. While the intolerant views on both sides view this as a loss of their maximum freedoms, it is clear that their assessment of the real people involved is simply false and self-serving. There are Israelis. There are Palestinians. These are not facts that can be eliminated with a debating point. There will always be Israelis and Palestinians in this region. Only genocide or cattle-cars - both unthinkable crimes against humanity - could be suggested to create an alternate reality. The two-state solution, with an Israel and a Palestine beside each other offering mutual recognition, and guaranteeing sovereignty, self-determination and human rights, is the only solution. This is not a compromise except for those who want to "have it all." There is no "all" to have.
There must be a Palestine. There must be an Israel. Both are legitimate as an historic legacy of the land and its peoples. Both are legitimate as a demographic reality well before 1948. Both are legitimate as a political necessity today. Every life lost in this conflict is a sacrifice on the altar of something. Pray that it be something other than inevitable violence and more war.
There are many to blame. Who do you blame, in order to justify your own intolerance? Whose intolerance must never be repeated? The Arab riots in the 1920's? The gross manipulation and political promises by mandatory Britain? The lack of genuine regional partnerships during the early waves of Aliyah? The Arab leaders' refusal to empower domestic Palestinian leaders in the early decades of Israel's existence? Arab agression? The early Israel military expansions in 1948 and 1967? The forcible relocation of Palestinians? The focus on pan-Arab movements to destroy Israel? The denial of legitimate Jewish population existing in Israel over centuries? The Islamicists? The revolutionaries? The settlers? The left? The right? The Arabs? The Israelis? The Jews? The Muslims? Europe? America? If you are blaming, you are part of the problem. There is plenty of blame to spread around. Until there is peace, no one has gotten it right yet. Nobody is perfect and pure.
Models for Peace. There are three great peace agreements that hold in the region today. First, the Camp David Accords (1978) returned the Sinai to Egypt, offered complete mutual recognition of Israel and Egypt and asserted that Palestinian sovereignty in the West Bank and Gaza must be achieved. Second, the Israel-Jordan peace treaty (1994) offered complete mutual recognition, warm cooperation as nations, and supported the Oslo Peace process which explicitly worked towards a two-state solution and resolution of the Palestinian refugee problem. Third, the Abraham Accords (2020) between Israel and UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, Sudan, which set no preconditions tied to Palestine or the Palestinians, instead breaking the historic pan-Arab policy of prioritizing Palestinian sovereignty over all other concerns. By rejecting the intolerant form of Pro-Palestinian arguments against Israel's legitimacy, each of these agreements explicitly demonstrated that peace can be achieved through bi-lateral recognition. If one wishes for peace between Israelis and Palestinians, it can not be based in any narrative of injustice. It must work from an assumption of mutual recognition. Every successful peace agreement has this in common.
Palestine Must Stand on Its Own. The age of mutual delegitimization must come to an end. Peace must come between Israel and any nation that wishes peace. Saudi Arabia. Syria. Lebanon. Oman. Palestine must exist in order for Israel to make peace with Palestinians. Palestinians can not rely on foreign advocacy or foreign legitimacy. It must be an expression of the Palestinian people, while asserting that Israel will continue to exist. That was the move of Oslo, which placed the Palestinian Authority in charge of much of the West Bank (Yehudah/Shomron). And that is what has kept the West Bank out of the current conflict. Hezbollah in the north, Houtis in the Gulf of Aqaba, Iran and Hamas all joined in the military attack on Israel since October 7th. The PA has sat it out, waiting for the war to end, in hope of being the diplomatic solution "after Gaza" on the path to their much hoped for Palestinian State. That has to count for something. It is the only current hope for an eventual partner for a genuine peace like the others. There are those who believe that is not possible. I have never heard them suggest a better solution. No one who delegitimizes Israel can be (or would want to be) a part of that peace, just as no one who delegitimizes Palestine can be (or would want to be) on the Israeli side of that peace.
The only argue against this is an argument against peace. There are many who are willing to fall back on narratives that result only in the use of force. Many of those voices are powerful leaders in Israel. Others are powerful leaders in the Palestinian protest movements. They offer nothing but conflict or bloodshed for the forseeable future.
The final outcome, the hope for the next generation, must be peace. Sovereign rights, authentic legacy, legitimate aspirations to rule ones own affairs in a nation of our own. On these topics Palestinians and Israelis must either admit eachother's dreams or condemn the next generation to endless war.
Palestine matters because Israel matters. Israel matters because Palestine matters.