Monday, March 3, 2014

Zionism and the real history of Esther and Mordechai

The Zionism of the Purim Story

The Book of Esther is one of the great mysteries of our tradition.

Yet the book is hard to place in history.  When and where did it occur? If Esther and Mordechai lived at a time when return to Israel was possible, then what lesson does it teach us about modern Zionism?

Here’s how we solve the mystery:

The Megillah’s only “historic” reference comes in Esther 2:5-6 – In the fortress Shushan lived a Jew by the name of Mordecai, son of Jair son of Shimei son of Kish a Benjaminite – who had been exiled from Jerusalem in the group that was carried into exile along with King Jeconiah of Judah, which had been driven into exile by King Neuechadnezzar of Babylon.

We know that the exile of Jeconiah of Judah happened around 597 BCE.  But which person in the verse here was exiled?  Was it Mordechai himself, so the Book of Esther was soon after? Or was it his great grandfather Kish, meaning Mordechai lived closer to the year 500 BCE?

The ‘kingdom of Persia’ at the time was the Archaemid Empire, which at its height ranged from modern Pakistan to the Crimea, Greece and Egypt. We know that in 539 BCE Cyrus the Great conquered Babylonia and permitted the Jews to return and rebuild the temple in Jerusalem, but no mention of that event is in the Book of Esther.  Why?

In Esther 1:19, during the search for a new queen, we read If it please Your Majesty, let a royal edict be issued by you, and let it be written into the laws of Persia and Media, so that it cannot be abrogated, that Vashti shall never enter the presence of King Achashverosh. Since Babylonia is not named, and Media is to its east, one opinion would say that Esther had to live before Cyrus conquered Babylonia (539 BCE) and it was Mordechai himself who was exiled. Therefore, return to Israel was not possible and they were trapped in exile.  This opinion, however, is hard to accept.

The city of Shusha began as the regional capital of Elam, which was also conquered by Cyrus the Great, in 539 BCE.  It was hardly a “great city” at that time. Yet it was expanded greatly by Cyrus’ son, Darius the Great (522-486 BCE), who is known in our books of Ezra, Nehemiah, Daniel, Haggai and Zechariah. But none of our other books mention a Jewish Queen at Darius’ side, nor a great leader and advisor - Mordechai.  Would they all omit a known event of such importance? No. So, for “Shushan HaBira” to be the “capital Shusha,” it would seem that  Esther and Mordecai would have lived later in Darius’ life.

The rabbinic tradition collapses ancient history into a relatively brief period of time, placing Mordechai as a member of the Great Assembly Ezra and Nehemia established under Cyrus and Darius.   According to the Talmud, Bava Batra 15a, it was “The Men of the Great Assembly” who wrote the book of Esther. 

Yet many scholars identify Achashverosh as a Jewish name for Darius’ successor, Xerxes I, which in turn places the whole story at the height of the Achaemenid Empire. In fact, Xerxes I subdued a Babylonian rebellion in 482 BCE, after which he refused to be named as “King of Persia and Babylonia,” but merely “King of Persia and Media.” The quote from Esther 1:19 suddenly makes sense in this new context. His rule ended in 465 BCE, so we can date the Book of Esther to somewhere between 482-465 BCE. And it must be Mordechai’s Great-Grandfather Kish who was exiled from Jerusalem with king Jeconiah in 597 BCE. All of the pieces of the puzzle have now fallen in place.


So, Purim occurs 55-70 years after Cyrus the Great permitted Jews to return to the land of Israel.  The second temple is built, and the return is possible.  But no mention of that fact is made in the Book of Esther. To me, this is the sad but important lesson of the book. Israel was weak, and irrelevant to the lives of the Jews of the great empire. Israel could not help, and was not involved in the threat posed by Haman.  And a mass aliyah from Shushan and the empire to Israel was clearly unthinkable.  In our day, we must ensure that no community is so abandoned again.

Monday, January 13, 2014

The Passing of Ariel Sharon, z"l


RA Saddened by the Passing of Ariel Sharon

Posted on Jan 11, 2014
NEW YORK – The Rabbinical Assembly is saddened by the passing of Ariel Sharon, whose years of service to the nation of Israel earned him widespread admiration among Israelis.  He earned and sustained a reputation for bravery and brilliance as a military commander, notwithstanding some periods of significant controversy. There was no single Israeli general who inspired his troops and led them as effectively as he did, and he was a towering figure of Israel's political scene for many years.  One of the most striking elements of his legacy was his willingness, in the late stages of his career, to change course by founding the Kadima political party and pushing for solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The death of such a towering figure naturally causes us to pause and reflect on his deep impact on the development of Israeli history.  Prime Minister Sharon served his country both as a daring military leader and as a political figure devoted to his nation's well-being.  We are humbled to think that for twenty-five years, he was on the front lines of every Israeli military conflict, often serving during battles that critically turned the tide in Israel's favor.  During his political career he steered the nation through a horrific Intifada and, in a move both bold and hopeful, engineered the withdrawal from the Gaza Strip for the sake of bringing peace to Israel and her neighbors.  Such accomplishments will undoubtedly become fixtures in the story of Israel's history. 

On behalf of the 1700 rabbis of the Rabbinical Assembly, we applaud Ariel Sharon's long career and its many moments of bravery and sacrifice.  We have no doubt that his decisive actions, both as a commander in Israel's wars and as a Prime Minister willing to act boldly for the sake of peace, have left a profound mark on Israel.  We hope that Sharon's legacy of a move from warrior to peace-seeker will inspire Israel and the Jewish people as this work remains unfinished. Our thoughts go out to his family, who have cared for him since his tragic stroke in 2006 and to whom we now extend our deepest condolences.